This study adopts the corpus-assisted discourse study(CADS)method, taking relevant reports from China's mainstream English media China Daily and the US mainstream media The New York Times after China proposed its “dual-carbon” goals in September 2020 as research corpora, to explore the similarities and differences in the discursive construction of China's carbon emissions issues by Chinese and foreign media. The findings reveal that both Chinese and foreign media take “environmental governance” as their core cognitive framework and narrate around dimensions such as the impacts of carbon emissions and governance measures, but there are significant discursive divides: Chinese media focus on evidence-based narratives such as policy advancement and technological breakthroughs to construct an image of China proactively assuming climate responsibilities and promoting green transition; in contrast, US media tend to adopt strategies such as responsibility attribution and risk amplification, focusing on the global impacts and governance challenges of carbon emissions, with some reports exhibiting ideological interpretation tendencies. This study not only provides empirical support for understanding the discursive game of environmental issues in cross-cultural contexts but also offers references for optimizing the international discourse communication strategy of China's carbon emission governance and enhancing the discourse power in global climate governance.

Jinxuan Chen, Zhongchen Wang, Yihuan Wu, Zheng Zhang. A Study on the Cross-Media Discursive Construction of China's Dual Carbon Goals —— A Corpus-Assisted Comparison of Representations in China Daily and the New York Times. International Journal of Social Sciences and Economic Management (2026), Vol. 7, Issue 1: 115-131. https://doi.doi.org/10.3807/IJSSEM.2026.070113.

[1] Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. Continuum.

[2] Baker, P., & Vessey, R. (2018). A corpus-driven comparison of English and French Islamist extremist texts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(3), 255-278. Bevitori, C. (2010). Discourses of climate change in the British press: A corpus-assisted analysis. Discourse Processes, 47(6), 359-382.

[3] Bevitori, C. (2015). Climate change discourse in the US press: A corpus-based study of ideological representations. Journal of Pragmatics, 81, 1-14.

[4] Cheng, X, &Lam, J. (2013). Western media representations of Hong Kong's return: A critical discourse analysis. Discourse Processes, 50(2), 87-108.

[5] Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.

[6] Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

[7] Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Clarendon Press.

[8] Hansen, A. (1991). The mass media and environmental politics. Manchester University Press.

[9] Hansen, A. (2010). Environmental communication: A cultural perspective. Sage Publications.

[10] Jaworska, A., et al. (2024). Management by keywords: Discursive construction of non-financial capital in integrated reports. Accounting, Auditing &Accountability Journal, 37(2), 456-483.

[11] Liu, Y., &Li, X. (2017). Framing haze in China: A comparative analysis of Chinese and Anglo-American newspapers. Environmental Communication, 11(3), 327-344.

[12] Ma, W. L., &Cui, Y. J. (2020). A corpus-based study of China's national image: A transitivity perspective Computer-Assisted Foreign Language Education, (5), 114-121.

[13] Qin, Y. (2022). Thematic evolution analysis of carbon emission research at home and abroad based on LDA model. Fuzhou University, Fuzhou.

[14] Qin, Y. (2022). Thematic evolution and frontier trends of carbon emission research at home and abroad: Visual analysis based on LDA model. Ecological Economy, 38(7), 34-40.

[15] Qian, Y. F., &Wang, C. H. (2023). The discursive construction of “carbon peaking and carbon neutrality” by People's Daily: A corpus-based discourse study. Journal of China University of Petroleum, Edition of Social Sciences, (4), 69-77.