Welcome to Scholar Publishing Group

International Journal of Social Sciences and Economic Management, 2025, 6(1); doi: 10.38007/IJSSEM.2025.060108.

On the Governance of Internet Public Opinion Polarization — Based on "Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action"

Author(s)

Yang Bai

Corresponding Author:
Yang Bai
Affiliation(s)

School of Law, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

Abstract

Since its inception, the internet has carried the hope of restoring and expanding interpersonal communication, promoting self-realization, facilitating meaningful encounters with others, and revitalizing subject relationships and social cohesion. However, in recent years, the public opinion arena has drastically deteriorated, with increasing polarization and growing difficulty in achieving peaceful, reasoned dialogues. This paper, while reviewing existing studies, reconsiders the deep-rooted causes of public opinion polarization—specifically the crisis of identity in the context of modernity. By adopting Habermas' perspective, this paper reconstructs the issue, highlights the problems with current governance measures, and suggests that the key to transforming these measures lies in the construction of communicative rationality.

Keywords

Public Opinion Polarization, Habermas, Communicative Action

Cite This Paper

Yang Bai. On the Governance of Internet Public Opinion Polarization — Based on "Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action". International Journal of Social Sciences and Economic Management (2025), Vol. 6, Issue 1: 76-87. https://doi.org/10.38007/IJSSEM.2025.060108.

References

[1] Habermas, J. (1989). Communicative Action and Social Evolution (Zhang, B., Trans.). Chongqing Publishing House, p. 3, p. 28.

[2] Habermas, J. (2004). Philosophical Discourse of Modernity (Cao, W., Trans.). Yilin Publishing House, p. 390.

[3] Sunstein, C. R. (2010). Republic.com 2.0: The Psychology of Group Behavior (Yin, H., Trans.). Xinhua Publishing House, p. 107.

[4] Le Bon, G. (2016). The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind (Chen, J., Trans.). Yilin Publishing House, p. 49.

[5] Dong, Y., & Chen, X. (2015). From "Polarization" to "Rationality": The Evolution Path of Public Opinion in Cyberspace—The Enlightenment of Baidu Encyclopedia's "PX Entry Defense War." Journal of Public Administration, 12(02), 155-156.

[6] He, M. (2020). The Conceptual Construction and Morphological Subdivision of Online Content Governance. Zhejiang Social Sciences, 2020(09), 64-72.

[7] Zhang, M., & Fang, F. (2021). Media, Relationships, and Interaction: Understanding the Internet "Public." Modern Communication (Journal of Communication University of China), 43(12), 144-148.

[8] Wu, Q. (2011). Public Opinion and Justice in the Internet Age—From the Perspective of Habermas's Theory of the Public Sphere. Global Legal Review, 33(02), 50-60.

[9] Wang, L., & Liu, Z. (2018). The Characteristics and Implications of Trump’s "Twitter Governance" in the Post-Truth Era. Foreign Social Sciences, 2018(03), 43-50.

[10] Wang, L., & Liu, Z. (2018). The Characteristics and Implications of Trump’s "Twitter Governance" in the Post-Truth Era. Foreign Social Sciences, 2018(03), 43-50.

[11] Yang, G. (2021). The Symptoms, Causes, and Reflections on Opinion Polarization in the Digital Age. Journalism Review, 2021(03), 4-10 + 27.

[12] Wu, Y., & Li, F. (2022). A Review of Research on Opinion Polarization. Information Journal, 41(04), 98-103 + 110.